Products kept in use
Repaired garments that can be used again.

Counting repairs is not enough. Our methodology looks at what really changes when a garment stays in use.
View the methodology · PDFClear data. Visible assumptions. No exaggerated results.More life for what already matters to you.
This relationship is not automatic. That is why the methodology considers the counterfactual scenario.
Repaired garments that can be used again.
Kilograms of repaired textile products, without automatically calling them avoided waste.
New purchases that reasonably do not happen thanks to the repair.
Work, hours and income generated for professionals and workshops.

If you had not been able to repair this item, what would you have done?
Examples of alternatives: the answer determines which impact we can attribute and which we cannot.
Observed or confirmed data.
Information obtained from Still users and operations.
External references and industry factors.
Our aim is to progressively replace estimates with our own verified data.
Impact of the displaced new product
Repair + logistics + materials + packaging
Potentially avoided CO₂e
This estimate only makes sense when there is a reasonable basis to consider that a new purchase has been displaced.
Change is stitched too.
These are the data the methodology proposes collecting to improve the model and move towards measurement based on real behaviour.

Explore the full methodology and its sources.
Same story. More future.